Strange Darling: a treat for the misogynist in you

Synopsis:

Set in rural Oregon, the film focuses on a man and woman who engage in a one-night stand that devolves into a cat-and-mouse game of murder. 

My thoughts:

If you are prone to misogyny, if you get a sinfully pleasant tingle when watching aggression towards women on screen, this film is a yummy treat, as most of your prejudices will be validated in a most indulgent way. I am sure there will be an ultra-woke reviewer out there who will interpret this movie as an act of justified "female rage" and "woman taking back agency", blah blah. If you dislike/mistrust women, covertly or openly, this flick is for you. I may be thinking too much into it, but it's no coincident that Oregon was chosen as the setting, a place where extremes co-exist. Radical liberals, doomsday survivalists, Native Americans and vindictive cops. Such a rich tapestry for a story involving a psychopath. The color scheme as well as out-of-sequence chapter structure will remind you of Lars von Trier. Strange Darling was shot on 33 mm film, resulting in a visual that throws you back to 1970s grindhouse esthetic. 

Separate kudos to Barbara Hershey, who reinvents herself in her mid-70s as the sinister old woman. 

The Blood on Satan's Claw (1971): Mean Girls for the 17th century

Synopsis:

When a mysterious corpse is accidentally dug up by a boy in a small town, a group of local teens starts acting very strangely. The adolescents, led by a girl named Angel (Linda Hayden), are convinced the corpse was once possessed. Hoping to get in touch with the devil through the body, the teens act out a series of demonic rituals that causes a stir among the townspeople. When word of the satanic activity spreads, certain parents start trying to lock up the kids behind the spooky stunts.

My thoughts:

For the fans of the original "Wicker Man", "The Witch" and "Midsommar", the 1971 "The Blood on Satan's Claw" is a must see. One of the themes in this folk horror gem is peer pressure among teens. A bit of historical context: adolescence was not considered a separate phase in a person's life. Once you reached puberty, you were married off and on your way to start procreating. What we see in this movie is a community of students in a church-based school. So we get some school dynamic with its hierarchy - not something you encounter often in films with a historical setting. The female antagonist and ringleader, a 17th century of Alicia Silverstone, uses her natural - and supernatural powers - to drive her peers into a satanic cult and sacrificing them one by one. One cliche comment from the critics that always makes me roll my eyes is that "men are afraid of female sexuality." Why does it always have to be male authority figures against demonic temptresses? Can we leave wokery out of sorcery for once? 

Pandemonium (2023): a peculiarly unfinished vision of hell

Synopsis: 

After realizing he has died at the scene of a car crash, Nathan descends into the depths of hell, where he is doomed to experience the pain of tortured souls along the way.

My thoughts:

In 2020s it's a challenge to come up with anything truly original when it comes to afterlife and hell. There are already so many nuanced, creative, subtle ways to depicting hell, that the only direction you can go is that of literal almost Medieval interpretation, with torture chambers and rambunctious demons. 

Pandemonium is a standalone horror film that almost feels like an anthology. There is a main storyline that ties several tangent episodes. I was surprised that the golden rule of 3 was violated and there were only 2 subplots. 

Despite its literal pseudo-Dantean depiction of hell, it leaves a little too much to the imagination. Some parts are fleshed out extensively, while others are truncated and end abruptly. It's one of those movies that ends abruptly, making you question whether the creators ran out of funds, energy drinks, protein bars? 

Djinn (2013) - Aladdin meets Rosemary's Baby

Synopsis:

An Emirati couple return home from a trip and discover that their new apartment has been built on a site that is home to some malevolent beings.

My thoughts:

 Have you had enough of freaky kid / possession tropes? Rest assured. Djinn (2013) is not your garden variety possession/exorcism movie. You don't need extensive knowledge of Islamic theology or folklore to appreciate this underrated horror piece. It explores such universal afflictions as postpartum depression, infant loss, grief, guilt and hallucinations. Salama is an educated, fairly westernized Emirati woman dealt one of the worst imaginable blows - her son's death due to SIDS. Reluctantly, she agrees to move to her native country after her husband Khalid gets a job offer. The move proves to be neither a fresh start nor homecoming. It's a trip into a dark parallel dimension. Stuck in a sinister luxurious apartment complex, she finds herself stripped of her identity and any optimistic vision for the future.   

The downside is the cartoonish approach to the hallucination sequence. The visuals and the special effects could have been subtler in some places (footprints on the ceiling, the sinister female form shrouded in black). Sometimes less is more. The luxurious high rise in the middle of nowhere, shrouded in fog, is sinister by itself. 

Maxxine: more blood than skin

I have been waiting for the conclusion of this - I will not hesitate to use that word - beloved trilogy. Maxxxine Minx, now in her early 30s, is living the best version of her best life as an adult film star. Surprisingly, the film leaves much to the imagination. We get many references to Miss Minx's prior cinematic masterpieces. We get winks, nods, grins from her fans. We get to meet her friends and coworkers. But we don't actually see her in action. There is more blood than skin. The common trope of a serial killer targeting starlets is taken to the next level and intertwined with another trope of satanic rituals. If you crave that win-win cocktails of your favorite noir and pulp hits, don't miss "Maxxxine". 

Mia Goth is not your mainstream "leading lady" material, and she knows it. The realization unties her hands. You will probably not see her starring in romcoms. There are too many dispensable, utterly forgettable actresses for that. 

The Zone of Interest: contextual horror

I watched this movie on a flight from San Diego to New York. It was listed under "new releases" next to the new musical version of "Mean Girls" - a very curious selection of titles, if you ask me. "The Zone of Interest" is not a film you can jump into without knowing the historical context. You almost need to watch 5-6 movies on the topic to fully appreciate the horror behind the scenes - "Schindler's List" and "Conspiracy" 2001 come to mind. "The Zone of Interest" is not a horror film that speaks for itself. There is nothing truly gruesome happening on the screen. No battles, no graphic genocide scenes. On the contrary, we see a big nuclear family enjoying an idyllic life in a countryside house. There is nothing immediately disturbing or remarkable. The horror is all in the context. The house is situated in an area around the Auschwitz concentration camp reserved for the SS. Before the war the land was used by Polish farmers. In 1941 the local population was removed from the area and their lands confiscated for the benefit of the SS. The doting father of the family turns out to be Rudolf Hoss, the camp commandant, who was executed after the war. Again, at a first glance, there is nothing inherently monstrous about him. Most films portray SS officers in the act of committing atrocities. This film shows a distressingly, freakishly human side of the monster. He plays with his kids, discusses household matters with his frumpy wife, even cheats on her in a most mechanical, emotionless manner - basically goes through the typical motions a man of his rank might go through. Nothing truly monstrous on the surface. Until you hear his name and learn the historical context. 

Three Musketeers: d'Artagnan (2023) - for the haters of A. Dumas

Greetings, commies!

Anyone else disappointed in the latest Three Musketeers adaptation? One would have expected a more respectful, more faithful adaptation from the French. I walked away with a weird impression that the creators had a deep disdain for the source material, since they butchered up the plot so mercilessly. I guess they despise Dumas. Otherwise, why would they create subplots that serve no purpose? D'Artagnan is shot upon arrival in France for no apparent reason. He ends up crawling out of a shallow grave. You don't even realize it's him until later. Athos is a Protestant, with some brother named Benjamin (a very strange name for an early 17th century French noble). Athos is framed for stabbing a lady in bed and faces execution. Porthos is presented as bisexual. Constance wears what looks like a hijab. The Louvre is like a roadside diner with minimal security. Random people walk in and out. The whole country is filthy and covered in black ashes, evoking images of Chernobyl fallout. But the cherry on top was a mass shooting a-la Kennedy. I understand that American producers have to spread wokery. But these are French filmmakers. Why?